We re-examine the case for uniform pricing in a monopolistic third-degree price-discrimination setting by introducing differentiated costs. Intuitively, the monopolist would like to use differentiated pricing also to decrease the average total cost, unless marginal costs are “perversely” correlated with demand elasticities. Indeed, monopolistic price differentiation can improve welfare and also aggregate consumer surplus even if, as in the benchmark linear case, total output does not increase. Accordingly, the welfare criterion based on total output fails and should be replaced by the computation of well-defined price indexes. These results pave the way for a more optimistic assessment of monopolistic pricing.

Monopolistic Price Flexibility and Social Welfare: The Linear Case

BERTOLETTI, PAOLO
2007-01-01

Abstract

We re-examine the case for uniform pricing in a monopolistic third-degree price-discrimination setting by introducing differentiated costs. Intuitively, the monopolist would like to use differentiated pricing also to decrease the average total cost, unless marginal costs are “perversely” correlated with demand elasticities. Indeed, monopolistic price differentiation can improve welfare and also aggregate consumer surplus even if, as in the benchmark linear case, total output does not increase. Accordingly, the welfare criterion based on total output fails and should be replaced by the computation of well-defined price indexes. These results pave the way for a more optimistic assessment of monopolistic pricing.
2007
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/130940
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact