We consider high order phase field functionals introduced in Borden et al. (2014) and provide a rigorous proof that these functionals converge to a sharp crack brittle fracture energy. We take into account three dimensional problems in linear elastic fracture mechanics and functionals defined both in Sobolev spaces and in spaces of tensor product B-splines. In the latter convergence holds when the mesh size vanishes faster than the internal length of the phase-field model. On the theoretical level, this condition is natural since the size of the phase field layer, around the crack, itself scales like the internal length; on the numerical level, it should be satisfied by local h-refinement. Technically, convergence holds in the sense of Γ-convergence, with respect to the strong topology of L1, while the sharp crack energy is defined in GSBD2. The constraint on the phase field to take values in [0,1] is taken into account both in the Sobolev setting and in the iso-geometric setting; in the latter, it requires a special treatment since the projection operator on the space of tensor product B-splines is not Lagrangian (i.e., interpolatory).

Γ-convergence for high order phase field fracture: Continuum and isogeometric formulations

Negri MATTEO
2020-01-01

Abstract

We consider high order phase field functionals introduced in Borden et al. (2014) and provide a rigorous proof that these functionals converge to a sharp crack brittle fracture energy. We take into account three dimensional problems in linear elastic fracture mechanics and functionals defined both in Sobolev spaces and in spaces of tensor product B-splines. In the latter convergence holds when the mesh size vanishes faster than the internal length of the phase-field model. On the theoretical level, this condition is natural since the size of the phase field layer, around the crack, itself scales like the internal length; on the numerical level, it should be satisfied by local h-refinement. Technically, convergence holds in the sense of Γ-convergence, with respect to the strong topology of L1, while the sharp crack energy is defined in GSBD2. The constraint on the phase field to take values in [0,1] is taken into account both in the Sobolev setting and in the iso-geometric setting; in the latter, it requires a special treatment since the projection operator on the space of tensor product B-splines is not Lagrangian (i.e., interpolatory).
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/1318146
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
social impact