BACKGROUND: beta-blockers are routinely prescribed in congenital long-QT syndrome (LQTS), but the effectiveness and limitations of beta-blockers in this disorder have not been evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population comprised 869 LQTS patients treated with beta-blockers. Effectiveness of beta-blockers was analyzed during matched periods before and after starting beta-blocker therapy, and by survivorship methods to determine factors associated with cardiac events while on prescribed beta-blockers. After initiation of beta-blockers, there was a significant (P<0.001) reduction in the rate of cardiac events in probands (0.97+/-1.42 to 0.31+/-0.86 events per year) and in affected family members (0. 26+/-0.84 to 0.15+/-0.69 events per year) during 5-year matched periods. On-therapy survivorship analyses revealed that patients with cardiac symptoms before beta-blockers (n=598) had a hazard ratio of 5.8 (95% CI, 3.7 to 9.1) for recurrent cardiac events (syncope, aborted cardiac arrest, or death) during beta-blocker therapy compared with asymptomatic patients; 32% of these symptomatic patients will have another cardiac event within 5 years while on prescribed beta-blockers. Patients with a history of aborted cardiac arrest before starting beta-blockers (n=113) had a hazard ratio of 12.9 (95% CI, 4.7 to 35.5) for aborted cardiac arrest or death while on prescribed beta-blockers compared with asymptomatic patients; 14% of these patients will have another arrest (aborted or fatal) within 5 years on beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: beta-blockers are associated with a significant reduction in cardiac events in LQTS patients. However, syncope, aborted cardiac arrest, and LQTS-related death continue to occur while patients are on prescribed beta-blockers, particularly in those who were symptomatic before starting this therapy.

Effectiveness and limitations of beta-blocker therapy in congenital Long QT Syndrome.

SCHWARTZ, PETER;PRIORI, SILVIA GIULIANA;Napolitano C;
1999-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: beta-blockers are routinely prescribed in congenital long-QT syndrome (LQTS), but the effectiveness and limitations of beta-blockers in this disorder have not been evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population comprised 869 LQTS patients treated with beta-blockers. Effectiveness of beta-blockers was analyzed during matched periods before and after starting beta-blocker therapy, and by survivorship methods to determine factors associated with cardiac events while on prescribed beta-blockers. After initiation of beta-blockers, there was a significant (P<0.001) reduction in the rate of cardiac events in probands (0.97+/-1.42 to 0.31+/-0.86 events per year) and in affected family members (0. 26+/-0.84 to 0.15+/-0.69 events per year) during 5-year matched periods. On-therapy survivorship analyses revealed that patients with cardiac symptoms before beta-blockers (n=598) had a hazard ratio of 5.8 (95% CI, 3.7 to 9.1) for recurrent cardiac events (syncope, aborted cardiac arrest, or death) during beta-blocker therapy compared with asymptomatic patients; 32% of these symptomatic patients will have another cardiac event within 5 years while on prescribed beta-blockers. Patients with a history of aborted cardiac arrest before starting beta-blockers (n=113) had a hazard ratio of 12.9 (95% CI, 4.7 to 35.5) for aborted cardiac arrest or death while on prescribed beta-blockers compared with asymptomatic patients; 14% of these patients will have another arrest (aborted or fatal) within 5 years on beta-blockers. CONCLUSIONS: beta-blockers are associated with a significant reduction in cardiac events in LQTS patients. However, syncope, aborted cardiac arrest, and LQTS-related death continue to occur while patients are on prescribed beta-blockers, particularly in those who were symptomatic before starting this therapy.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/431428
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 140
  • Scopus 733
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact