This paper will seek to do two things: firstly providing the reader with an overview and an analysis of the EU’s political, economic and security relations with Japan, China and North Korea. What does the EU “do” or does not do in terms of politics, economics and security with Tokyo, Beijing and Pyongyang? Are the EU and Japan doing what they have planned and envisioned to do with regards to Asian (and global) security or will their bilateral relations continue to be above all a trade and investment relationship? Does China perceive Brussels as “real” security actor in Asia and what impact do EU-Chinatrade and investment relations (and the problems associated with them) have on Beijing’s willingness to discuss and work on Asian security with Brussels? What does North Korea want from Brussels: aid, money and technical assistance only or also a role and engagement in Northeast Asian security and the resolution of the ongoing nuclear crisis on the Korean Peninsula? Secondly, through the analysis of Brussels economic, political and security ties with these three countries it will be sought to draw conclusions on the EU’s overall role and engagement in Asian security. What does and does not EU security cooperation with Japan, China and (to a lesser extent North Korea) say about the EU’s overall role and engagement in Asian security?

The EU’s Relations with China, Japan and North Korea. Implications for the EU’s Role and Engagement in Asian Security (ISPI Working Paper February 2010)

BERKOFSKY, AXEL
2010-01-01

Abstract

This paper will seek to do two things: firstly providing the reader with an overview and an analysis of the EU’s political, economic and security relations with Japan, China and North Korea. What does the EU “do” or does not do in terms of politics, economics and security with Tokyo, Beijing and Pyongyang? Are the EU and Japan doing what they have planned and envisioned to do with regards to Asian (and global) security or will their bilateral relations continue to be above all a trade and investment relationship? Does China perceive Brussels as “real” security actor in Asia and what impact do EU-Chinatrade and investment relations (and the problems associated with them) have on Beijing’s willingness to discuss and work on Asian security with Brussels? What does North Korea want from Brussels: aid, money and technical assistance only or also a role and engagement in Northeast Asian security and the resolution of the ongoing nuclear crisis on the Korean Peninsula? Secondly, through the analysis of Brussels economic, political and security ties with these three countries it will be sought to draw conclusions on the EU’s overall role and engagement in Asian security. What does and does not EU security cooperation with Japan, China and (to a lesser extent North Korea) say about the EU’s overall role and engagement in Asian security?
2010
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/579147
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact