This paper shows how pipe replacements and control valve installations can be optimized in water distribution networks to reduce leakage, under minimum nodal pressure constraints. To this end, a hybrid multiobjective algorithm, which has pipe diameters and valve positions and settings as decisional variables, was set up. The algorithm also enables identification of the isolation valves that have to be closed in order to improve effectiveness of the control valves installed. The algorithm is initially applied to the optimal valve location problem, where it explores the trade-off between the number of installed control valves and the daily leakage volume. In this context, the analysis of the results proves the new algorithm more effective than a multiobjective genetic algorithm widely adopted in the scientific literature. Furthermore, it shows that if some isolation valves identified ad hoc are closed in the network, the installation of control valves determines larger leakage volume reductions. In a second application of the algorithm, pipe replacements and control valve installations are simultaneously performed. In this case, a Pareto front of trade-off solutions between installation costs and daily leakage volume is obtained. For the choice of the final solution within the front, an economic criterion based on the long-term convenience analysis is also illustrated.

Multiobjective optimization of pipe replacements and control valve installations for leakage attenuation in water distribution networks

CREACO, ENRICO FORTUNATO;
2015-01-01

Abstract

This paper shows how pipe replacements and control valve installations can be optimized in water distribution networks to reduce leakage, under minimum nodal pressure constraints. To this end, a hybrid multiobjective algorithm, which has pipe diameters and valve positions and settings as decisional variables, was set up. The algorithm also enables identification of the isolation valves that have to be closed in order to improve effectiveness of the control valves installed. The algorithm is initially applied to the optimal valve location problem, where it explores the trade-off between the number of installed control valves and the daily leakage volume. In this context, the analysis of the results proves the new algorithm more effective than a multiobjective genetic algorithm widely adopted in the scientific literature. Furthermore, it shows that if some isolation valves identified ad hoc are closed in the network, the installation of control valves determines larger leakage volume reductions. In a second application of the algorithm, pipe replacements and control valve installations are simultaneously performed. In this case, a Pareto front of trade-off solutions between installation costs and daily leakage volume is obtained. For the choice of the final solution within the front, an economic criterion based on the long-term convenience analysis is also illustrated.
2015
Civil Engineering covers engineering-based resources in the subfields of structural engineering, geotechnics, earthquake engineering, ocean engineering, water resources and supply, naval engineering, marine engineering, transportation engineering, and municipal engineering. Topics covered include the planning, design, construction, and maintenance of fixed structures and ground facilities for industry, occupancy, transportation, use and control of water, and harbor facilities.
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
STAMPA
141
3
04014059
Control valve; Genetic algorithms; Leakage; Linear programming; Multiobjective optimization; Pressure; Water distribution
http://ojps.aip.org/wro/
no
2
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Creaco, ENRICO FORTUNATO; Pezzinga, G.
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/1106385
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 88
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 82
social impact