OBJECTIVE: To clarify the controversial issue of whether autonomic influences modulate vascular nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatation or even directly contribute to production of nitric oxide (NO) via nitroxidergic fibers. METHODS: Chronic venous and arterial catheters were implanted in Wistar-Kyoto rats (n = 65) for continuous blood pressure measurement, drug administration and blood sampling. Tonic NO-dependent vasodilatation in the conscious free-moving animal was evaluated as the pressor response to inhibition of NO synthesis by intravenous L-monomethylarginine (a 100 mg/kg intravenous bolus plus 0.5 mg/kg per min infusion for 30 min). Experiments were performed under control conditions, chemical sympathectomy by 6-hydroxy-dopamine, ganglionic blockade by hexamethonium, and surgical denervation of sino-aortic baroreceptors. RESULTS: Baseline mean arterial pressure was 100+/-4 mmHg (mean +/- SEM) in control rats and 73+/-3, 62+/-5, and 105+/-10 mmHg in sympathectomized, ganglion-blocked, and denervated rats, respectively. The peak increase in mean arterial pressure after administration of L-monomethylarginine was 38+/-3 mmHg in control rats and 51+/-3, 50+/-6, and 63+/-10 mmHg in sympathectomized, ganglion-blocked, and denervated rats, respectively. Epinephrine and norepinephrine levels in rats of separate groups of unanesthetized control, sympathectomized and ganglion-blocked animals were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography from an arterial blood sample, the results indicating drastic reductions in levels of both catecholamines in the ganglion-blocked (but not in the sympathectomized) rats compared with those in the control rats. CONCLUSIONS: Tonic NO-dependent vasodilatation can normally be maintained in the unanesthetized unrestrained rat irrespective of autonomic or humoral adrenergic influences.

Lack of contribution of autonomic influences to vascular nitric oxide release? Studies in the unanesthetized rat.

PERLINI, STEFANO;
1998-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the controversial issue of whether autonomic influences modulate vascular nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatation or even directly contribute to production of nitric oxide (NO) via nitroxidergic fibers. METHODS: Chronic venous and arterial catheters were implanted in Wistar-Kyoto rats (n = 65) for continuous blood pressure measurement, drug administration and blood sampling. Tonic NO-dependent vasodilatation in the conscious free-moving animal was evaluated as the pressor response to inhibition of NO synthesis by intravenous L-monomethylarginine (a 100 mg/kg intravenous bolus plus 0.5 mg/kg per min infusion for 30 min). Experiments were performed under control conditions, chemical sympathectomy by 6-hydroxy-dopamine, ganglionic blockade by hexamethonium, and surgical denervation of sino-aortic baroreceptors. RESULTS: Baseline mean arterial pressure was 100+/-4 mmHg (mean +/- SEM) in control rats and 73+/-3, 62+/-5, and 105+/-10 mmHg in sympathectomized, ganglion-blocked, and denervated rats, respectively. The peak increase in mean arterial pressure after administration of L-monomethylarginine was 38+/-3 mmHg in control rats and 51+/-3, 50+/-6, and 63+/-10 mmHg in sympathectomized, ganglion-blocked, and denervated rats, respectively. Epinephrine and norepinephrine levels in rats of separate groups of unanesthetized control, sympathectomized and ganglion-blocked animals were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography from an arterial blood sample, the results indicating drastic reductions in levels of both catecholamines in the ganglion-blocked (but not in the sympathectomized) rats compared with those in the control rats. CONCLUSIONS: Tonic NO-dependent vasodilatation can normally be maintained in the unanesthetized unrestrained rat irrespective of autonomic or humoral adrenergic influences.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/112214
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact