Cellularized scaffold is emerging as the preferred solution for tissue regeneration and restoration of damaged functionalities. However, the high cost of preclinical studies creates a gap between investigation and the device market for the biomedical industry. In this work, bone-tailored scaffolds based on the Ti6Al4V alloy manufactured by electron beam melting (EBM) technology with reused powder were investigated, aiming to overcome issues connected to the high cost of preclinical studies. Two different elementary unit cell scaffold geometries, namely diamond (DO) and rhombic dodecahedron (RD), were adopted, while surface functionalization was performed by coating scaffolds with single layers of polycaprolactone (PCL) or with mixture of polycaprolactone and 20 wt.% hydroxyapatite (PCL/HA). The mechanical and biological performances of the produced scaffolds were investigated, and the results were compared to software simulation and experimental evidence available in literature. Good mechanical properties and a favorable environment for cell growth were obtained for all combinations of scaffold geometry and surface functionalization. In conclusion, powder recycling provides a viable practice for the biomedical industry to strongly reduce preclinical costs without altering biomechanical performance.

Topological, Mechanical and Biological Properties of Ti6Al4V Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Regeneration Fabricated with Reused Powders via Electron Beam Melting

Bloise N;Fassina L;Visai L;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Cellularized scaffold is emerging as the preferred solution for tissue regeneration and restoration of damaged functionalities. However, the high cost of preclinical studies creates a gap between investigation and the device market for the biomedical industry. In this work, bone-tailored scaffolds based on the Ti6Al4V alloy manufactured by electron beam melting (EBM) technology with reused powder were investigated, aiming to overcome issues connected to the high cost of preclinical studies. Two different elementary unit cell scaffold geometries, namely diamond (DO) and rhombic dodecahedron (RD), were adopted, while surface functionalization was performed by coating scaffolds with single layers of polycaprolactone (PCL) or with mixture of polycaprolactone and 20 wt.% hydroxyapatite (PCL/HA). The mechanical and biological performances of the produced scaffolds were investigated, and the results were compared to software simulation and experimental evidence available in literature. Good mechanical properties and a favorable environment for cell growth were obtained for all combinations of scaffold geometry and surface functionalization. In conclusion, powder recycling provides a viable practice for the biomedical industry to strongly reduce preclinical costs without altering biomechanical performance.
2021
Experimental Biology covers a wide array of topics concerned with research in general biology and biological systems, including evolution, ecology, radiation biology, anatomy, general biology, and resources containing diverse topics in basic biology research. Resources on general biomedicine are excluded and are covered in the Medical Research: General Topics category. Resources with strong reliance on fields that fall outside of the core topics of Life sciences, such as biomedical engineering are placed in the Multidisciplinary category.
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
ELETTRONICO
14
1(224)
1
20
20
titanium implants, additive manufacturing, reused powder, unit cell topology, tissue engineering, mechanical properties, stem cells, surface functionalization
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33466387/
no
8
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Gatto, Ml; Groppo, R; Bloise, N; Fassina, L; Visai, L; Galati, M; Iuliano, L; Mengucci, P
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/1367854
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 40
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 33
social impact