The paper aims to analyse originally, also in the light of a few main categories of the ancient scepticism, some arguments put forward in Bobbio’s book L’età dei diritti in favour of ethical relativism. I qualify three of these arguments as proheretic and two arguments as theoretical. Within the discussion of the first theoretical argument, I distinguish between a priori arguments from disagreement and a posteriori arguments from disagreement; within the discussion of the second theoretical argument, I distinguish between two meanings of absolute ethical foundation.
Sull'antifondazionalismo etico di Bobbio. Rileggendo L'età dei diritti
Stefano Colloca
2021-01-01
Abstract
The paper aims to analyse originally, also in the light of a few main categories of the ancient scepticism, some arguments put forward in Bobbio’s book L’età dei diritti in favour of ethical relativism. I qualify three of these arguments as proheretic and two arguments as theoretical. Within the discussion of the first theoretical argument, I distinguish between a priori arguments from disagreement and a posteriori arguments from disagreement; within the discussion of the second theoretical argument, I distinguish between two meanings of absolute ethical foundation.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
