This book investigates the unresolved issue of democratic legitimacy in contexts of pervasive disagreement and contributes to this debate by defending a relational version of political liberalism that rests on the ideal of co-authorship. According to this proposal, democratic legitimacy depends upon establishing appropriate interactions among citizens who ought to ascribe to one another the status of putative practical and epistemic authorities. To support this relational reading of political liberalism, the book proposes a revised account of the civic virtue of reasonableness along with an investigation of the epistemic-specific dimension of political equality. By engaging with political epistemology and social theory, this book explores ways to address inherent tensions within the liberal paradigm, using the following strategies of addressing these tensions: first, it defends a twofold model of legitimacy that distinguishes the goals, methodologies, and justificatory tasks of both ideal and nonideal phases of the two-level justificatory framework; second, it contends that democratic legitimacy requires an engaged and contextual critical appraisal of the injustices that characterize our daily social lives, illustrating how structural forms of injustice represent a profound betrayal of the liberal ideal of democratic legitimacy.

Relational Liberalism. Democratic Co-Authorship in a Pluralistic World

Federica Liveriero
2023-01-01

Abstract

This book investigates the unresolved issue of democratic legitimacy in contexts of pervasive disagreement and contributes to this debate by defending a relational version of political liberalism that rests on the ideal of co-authorship. According to this proposal, democratic legitimacy depends upon establishing appropriate interactions among citizens who ought to ascribe to one another the status of putative practical and epistemic authorities. To support this relational reading of political liberalism, the book proposes a revised account of the civic virtue of reasonableness along with an investigation of the epistemic-specific dimension of political equality. By engaging with political epistemology and social theory, this book explores ways to address inherent tensions within the liberal paradigm, using the following strategies of addressing these tensions: first, it defends a twofold model of legitimacy that distinguishes the goals, methodologies, and justificatory tasks of both ideal and nonideal phases of the two-level justificatory framework; second, it contends that democratic legitimacy requires an engaged and contextual critical appraisal of the injustices that characterize our daily social lives, illustrating how structural forms of injustice represent a profound betrayal of the liberal ideal of democratic legitimacy.
2023
Philosophy covers resources on every branch of philosophy, including aesthetics, ethics, metaphysics, and the philosophy of science.
Inglese
Internazionale
STAMPA
Philosophy and Politics
24
1
291
291
978-3-031-22742-4
978-3-031-22743-1
Springer Nature
Cham
SVIZZERA
This book brings together political theory, epistemology and critical analysis in dealing with deep political disagreement. It defends a relational version of political liberalism that rests on the ideal of co-authorship and it sheds light on the epistemic dimension of political equality that has been mostly overlooked. This Springer's book series is specifically focused on philosophy and politics and is a well-established internationally recognized series in the political philosophy field.
Political Legitimacy and Disagreement, Social virtue of reasonableness, Compromise for Democratic Decisions, Epistemology of Disagreement, Epistemic Circumstances of Justice
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-031-22743-1
no
276
1
Liveriero, Federica
none
info:eu-repo/semantics/book
3 Libro::3.1 Monografia o trattato scientifico
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/1475734
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact