Background: Pediatric dentistry has been radically revolutionized in recent years with the atraumatic approach (atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)), which is able to preserve the vitality of the tooth, with a higher attention to the child’s well-being and emotional comfort. In this scenario, the use of ozone with its decontaminating power and bacterial load reduction, can play a decisive role in the application of the principles of selective caries removal (SCR). The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of ozonized gel (GeliO3) and gaseous ozone (healOzone X4) by analysing colony forming unit (CFU) microbial load of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) after caries removal, together with patient sensitivity and compliance. Methods: 16 patients aged 4–12 years were enrolled and randomly assigned to gel or gas treatment. Baseline dental and periodontal indices, such as Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS), and Basic Erosive Wear Examination, were assessed. After manual caries removal with an excavator, microbiological samples were collected with a sterile paper cone at T0 (before treatment), T1 (after ozone application for 30 seconds), and T2 (after an additional 30 seconds application). Schiff Air Index (SAI) and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) were recorded at T0 and at T2 to evaluate patients’ compliance and dental sensitivity of the clinical procedure. Data underwent statistical analysis (significance: p < 0.05). Results: Significantly lower microbial loads were found after treatment in both groups (p < 0.05) with no significant between-group differences (p > 0.05). SAI and FLACC showed no significant inter-and intragroup differences at any time point (p > 0.05). Conclusions: GeliO3 and healOzone X4 demonstrated comparable antimicrobial effect against S. mutans. The procedures had no emotional impact on paediatric patients. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06641323).

The antimicrobial effect and pain control of ozonized gel versus gaseous ozone in the management of primary molars caries: randomized clinical trial with in vivo microbiological evaluation

Colombo Marco;Pascadopoli Maurizio
;
Virgili Noemi;Pietrocola Giampiero;Motta Chiara;Scribante Andrea.
2026-01-01

Abstract

Background: Pediatric dentistry has been radically revolutionized in recent years with the atraumatic approach (atraumatic restorative treatment (ART)), which is able to preserve the vitality of the tooth, with a higher attention to the child’s well-being and emotional comfort. In this scenario, the use of ozone with its decontaminating power and bacterial load reduction, can play a decisive role in the application of the principles of selective caries removal (SCR). The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of ozonized gel (GeliO3) and gaseous ozone (healOzone X4) by analysing colony forming unit (CFU) microbial load of Streptococcus mutans (S. mutans) after caries removal, together with patient sensitivity and compliance. Methods: 16 patients aged 4–12 years were enrolled and randomly assigned to gel or gas treatment. Baseline dental and periodontal indices, such as Gingival Index (GI), Plaque Index (PI), International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS), and Basic Erosive Wear Examination, were assessed. After manual caries removal with an excavator, microbiological samples were collected with a sterile paper cone at T0 (before treatment), T1 (after ozone application for 30 seconds), and T2 (after an additional 30 seconds application). Schiff Air Index (SAI) and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) were recorded at T0 and at T2 to evaluate patients’ compliance and dental sensitivity of the clinical procedure. Data underwent statistical analysis (significance: p < 0.05). Results: Significantly lower microbial loads were found after treatment in both groups (p < 0.05) with no significant between-group differences (p > 0.05). SAI and FLACC showed no significant inter-and intragroup differences at any time point (p > 0.05). Conclusions: GeliO3 and healOzone X4 demonstrated comparable antimicrobial effect against S. mutans. The procedures had no emotional impact on paediatric patients. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06641323).
2026
Medical Research, Organs & Systems includes resources dealing with the normal and disease states of single organs, tissues, or single physiological systems, exclusive of the heart, vascular and immune systems. Systems covered here include hepatology, pulmonary function/physiology, gastroenterology, otolaryngology, respiratory system, andrology, gynecology and reproduction, dermatology, and dentistry/odontology. Resources dealing with general physiology, classes of disease that immediately affect many or all body systems, and medical research focused on specific types of medical intervention are excluded.
The Dentistry/Oral Surgery & Medicine category covers resources concerned with all aspects of dental science and practice including dental implants and dental materials. Specialties such as orthodontics, periodontology, endodontics, prosthodontics, and pediatric dentistry are also included. Oral Surgery & Medicine resources are concerned with basic, applied, and clinical aspects of oral infections and diseases, including their epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation. Specialties such as oral pathology/biology, oral epidemiology, oral rehabilitation, and oral implants are also included. Facial pain and craniomandibular resources are also covered in this category.
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
ELETTRONICO
50
1
66
77
12
Antimicrobial agents; Dental caries; Ozone; Ozonized gel; Pediatric dentistry; Streptococcus mutans
no
8
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Colombo, Marco; Pascadopoli, Maurizio; Canova Fabio, Federici; Beretta, Matteo; Virgili, Noemi; Pietrocola, Giampiero; Motta, Chiara; Scribante, Andre...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/1541635
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact