The development of a microfilm is one of the very first steps in the succession process, taking place on bare surfaces exposed to aquatic environments, where microalgae, especially diatoms, are among the early colonizers. To prevent or minimize this undesired growth in artificial structures antifouling (AF) measures are applied, coatings being the most common ones. This work studied the effects of two commercially available coatings, a traditional biocide-based one (BC) and an alternative foul-release (FR) one, from a multi-taxa and biological multilevel approach. Three microalgae species were selected, including pelagic non-target species and a benthic target diatom, and exposed for 72 h to AF lixiviates to measure various biological endpoints. Toxicity screening assays revealed that exposure to BC lixiviates inhibited growth in all test species and affected photosynthetic efficiency differently, the diatom being the most sensitive one, while FR lixiviate primarily induced subcellular responses, rather than major physiological impairments. Additionally, exposure altered total pigment content in the three tested algae, particularly under BC treatments. Subcellular responses demonstrated differences in biomarkers of oxidative stress (catalase and glutathione S-transferase activities and lipid peroxidation levels) in the microalgae between BC and FR treatments. Cellular metal sorption levels did not show clear differences across treatments nor species. Overall, exposure to BC and FR antifouling lixiviates directly affected both target and non-target microalgae species, although the type and magnitude of the responses varied according to species and treatments. Multi-taxa and multi-level approaches with microalgae provide a broad overview of the biological responses and serve as a valuable tool in aquatic toxicology.

Toxicity of vessel antifouling coating lixiviates in target and non-target marine microalgal species: multi-taxa and biological multi-level approach testing

Santos-Simon, Mar
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Marchini, Agnese
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2026-01-01

Abstract

The development of a microfilm is one of the very first steps in the succession process, taking place on bare surfaces exposed to aquatic environments, where microalgae, especially diatoms, are among the early colonizers. To prevent or minimize this undesired growth in artificial structures antifouling (AF) measures are applied, coatings being the most common ones. This work studied the effects of two commercially available coatings, a traditional biocide-based one (BC) and an alternative foul-release (FR) one, from a multi-taxa and biological multilevel approach. Three microalgae species were selected, including pelagic non-target species and a benthic target diatom, and exposed for 72 h to AF lixiviates to measure various biological endpoints. Toxicity screening assays revealed that exposure to BC lixiviates inhibited growth in all test species and affected photosynthetic efficiency differently, the diatom being the most sensitive one, while FR lixiviate primarily induced subcellular responses, rather than major physiological impairments. Additionally, exposure altered total pigment content in the three tested algae, particularly under BC treatments. Subcellular responses demonstrated differences in biomarkers of oxidative stress (catalase and glutathione S-transferase activities and lipid peroxidation levels) in the microalgae between BC and FR treatments. Cellular metal sorption levels did not show clear differences across treatments nor species. Overall, exposure to BC and FR antifouling lixiviates directly affected both target and non-target microalgae species, although the type and magnitude of the responses varied according to species and treatments. Multi-taxa and multi-level approaches with microalgae provide a broad overview of the biological responses and serve as a valuable tool in aquatic toxicology.
2026
Environment/Ecology is a broad category covering interrelated disciplines. It includes resources dealing with pure and applied ecology, ecological modelling and engineering, ecotoxicology, and evolutionary ecology. In environmental science, some of the many areas covered are environmental contamination and toxicology, environmental health, monitoring, technology, geology, and management. Other fields covered are soil science and conservation, water resources research and engineering, climate change, and biodiversity conservation. Regional naturalist resources are also covered here.
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
ELETTRONICO
216
107910
Antifouling Isochrysis galbana Tetraselmis sp Cylindrotheca sp Growth Pigments Oxidative stress
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0141113626000796?via=ihub
6
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Santos-Simon, Mar; Seoane, Sergio; Etxebarria, Nestor; Marchini, Agnese; Blanco-Rayón, Esther; Ortiz-Zarragoitia, Maren
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/1543235
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact