Objective: Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the most effective treatment for relieving menopausal symptoms. However, many women avoid this therapy due to fear, and in Brazil numerous cities lack access to this treatment in the public health system. This study aimed to investigate prescribing habits regarding MHT among gynecologist-obstetricians in the Brazilian public versus private health systems, and to identify the main barriers to its use. Method: This descriptive cross-sectional study utilized a quantitative approach. Gynecologist-obstetricians from across Brazil were invited to complete a structured electronic questionnaire assessing their prescribing practices in both the public and private health sectors. Result: A total of 433 valid responses were analyzed. Among them, 51.5% of participants reported providing care to climacteric patients in the public health system, with 46.2% working in both sectors. Among physicians practicing in both settings, 76.5% reported prescribing MHT more frequently in the private sector. The main barriers to MHT prescription in the public system were treatment cost (68.2%) and lack of availability of free medication (61.4%), while in the private system the predominant barriers were fear of therapy-related risks (93.6%), especially cancer. Only 27.8% reported free access to MHT in their cities. Conclusion: The findings indicate that MHT prescribing practices in Brazil are still significantly influenced by structural barriers in the public sector and by negative perceptions in the private sector. Interventions aimed at expanding access and educating both physicians and patients are essential to ensure safe and equitable use of MHT.

Is the patients' fear of cancer the main barrier to prescribing menopausal hormone therapy?

Nappi, Rossella Elena;
2026-01-01

Abstract

Objective: Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) is the most effective treatment for relieving menopausal symptoms. However, many women avoid this therapy due to fear, and in Brazil numerous cities lack access to this treatment in the public health system. This study aimed to investigate prescribing habits regarding MHT among gynecologist-obstetricians in the Brazilian public versus private health systems, and to identify the main barriers to its use. Method: This descriptive cross-sectional study utilized a quantitative approach. Gynecologist-obstetricians from across Brazil were invited to complete a structured electronic questionnaire assessing their prescribing practices in both the public and private health sectors. Result: A total of 433 valid responses were analyzed. Among them, 51.5% of participants reported providing care to climacteric patients in the public health system, with 46.2% working in both sectors. Among physicians practicing in both settings, 76.5% reported prescribing MHT more frequently in the private sector. The main barriers to MHT prescription in the public system were treatment cost (68.2%) and lack of availability of free medication (61.4%), while in the private system the predominant barriers were fear of therapy-related risks (93.6%), especially cancer. Only 27.8% reported free access to MHT in their cities. Conclusion: The findings indicate that MHT prescribing practices in Brazil are still significantly influenced by structural barriers in the public sector and by negative perceptions in the private sector. Interventions aimed at expanding access and educating both physicians and patients are essential to ensure safe and equitable use of MHT.
2026
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
29
2
227
230
4
Menopausal hormone therapy; access to essential medicines; access to therapy; private sector; public sector
7
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Pompei, Isabella Melo; Magdalena, Sabrina Lara Abonizio; Arimura, Vivien Suemi; Machado, Rogério Bonassi; Fernandes, César Eduardo; Nappi, Rossella El...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/1549099
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact