Introduction: The fascia iliaca block (FIB) is currently recommended as a component of multimodal acute pain management for patients with hip fracture. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a newer technique that may provide superior analgesia. We therefore designed this study in an academic emergency department to compare the acute analgesic effect of these two approaches in patients with a hip fracture. Methods: Adult patients with an acute hip fracture who reported at least moderate pain were eligible for inclusion. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either a PENG block with 20 ml 0.375% levobupivacaine plus 4 mg dexamethasone or infra-inguinal FIB with 30 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine plus 4 mg dexamethasone. Primary outcome was the percentage of summed pain intensity difference (%SPID) calculated from visual analogue pain scores measured during the first hour post-block. Secondary outcomes included: number of patients reaching 33% and 50% SPID; dose of rescue opioid administered in morphine milligram equivalents; and incidence of adverse events. Results: In total, 92 patients were screened for eligibility and 64 were enrolled (32 in each group). Patients allocated to the PENG block group showed a greater %SPID when compared with those allocated to the FIB group (62.7% (95%CI 52.9–72.4%) vs. 38.0% (95%CI 30.7–45.4%), respectively; difference: -24.7% (95%CI -36.6 to -12.7%), p < 0.001). In the PENG group, 24/32 patients achieved 50% SPID compared with 7/32 in the FIB group (p < 0.001). Similarly, in the PENG group, 28/32 patients achieved 33% SPID compared with 19/32 in the FIB group (p = 0.022). There was no significant difference in the rescue opioid dose administered or in the incidence of adverse events. Discussion: The PENG block provides superior analgesia for the first hour after intervention when compared with the infra-inguinal FIB and represents a promising modality for acute pain management in emergency departments

Comparing the pericapsular nerve group block and fascia iliaca block for acute pain management in patients with hip fracture: a randomised clinical trial

Santi Di Pietro
;
Riccardo Maffeis;Eugenio Jannelli;Benedetta Mascia;Flavia Resta;Annalisa De Silvestri;Valeria Musella;Federico Grassi;Stefano Perlini
2025-01-01

Abstract

Introduction: The fascia iliaca block (FIB) is currently recommended as a component of multimodal acute pain management for patients with hip fracture. The pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a newer technique that may provide superior analgesia. We therefore designed this study in an academic emergency department to compare the acute analgesic effect of these two approaches in patients with a hip fracture. Methods: Adult patients with an acute hip fracture who reported at least moderate pain were eligible for inclusion. Patients were allocated randomly to receive either a PENG block with 20 ml 0.375% levobupivacaine plus 4 mg dexamethasone or infra-inguinal FIB with 30 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine plus 4 mg dexamethasone. Primary outcome was the percentage of summed pain intensity difference (%SPID) calculated from visual analogue pain scores measured during the first hour post-block. Secondary outcomes included: number of patients reaching 33% and 50% SPID; dose of rescue opioid administered in morphine milligram equivalents; and incidence of adverse events. Results: In total, 92 patients were screened for eligibility and 64 were enrolled (32 in each group). Patients allocated to the PENG block group showed a greater %SPID when compared with those allocated to the FIB group (62.7% (95%CI 52.9–72.4%) vs. 38.0% (95%CI 30.7–45.4%), respectively; difference: -24.7% (95%CI -36.6 to -12.7%), p < 0.001). In the PENG group, 24/32 patients achieved 50% SPID compared with 7/32 in the FIB group (p < 0.001). Similarly, in the PENG group, 28/32 patients achieved 33% SPID compared with 19/32 in the FIB group (p = 0.022). There was no significant difference in the rescue opioid dose administered or in the incidence of adverse events. Discussion: The PENG block provides superior analgesia for the first hour after intervention when compared with the infra-inguinal FIB and represents a promising modality for acute pain management in emergency departments
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/1557636
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact