Background. Cervical cancer is caused primarily by human papillomaviruses (HPV). The polymorphism rs1042522 at codon 72 of the TP53 tumour-suppressor gene has been investigated as a genetic cofactor. More than 80 studies were done between 1998 and 2006, after it was initially reported that women who are homozygous for the arginine allele had a risk for cervical cancer seven times higher than women who were heterozygous for the allele. However, results have been inconsistent. Here we analyse pooled data from 49 studies to determine whether there is an association between TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and cervical cancer. Methods. Individual data on 7946 cases and 7888 controls from 49 diff erent studies worldwide were reanalysed. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated using logistic regression, stratifying by study and ethnic origin. Subgroup analyses were done for infection with HPV, ethnic origin, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, study quality, and the material used to determine TP53 genotype. Findings. The pooled estimates (OR) for invasive cervical cancer were 1·22 (95% CI 1·08–1·39) for arginine homozygotes compared with heterozygotes, and 1·13 (0·94–1·35) for arginine homozygotes versus proline homozygotes. Subgroup analyses showed signifi cant excess risks only in studies where controls were not in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (1·71 [1·21–2·42] for arginine homozygotes compared with heterozygotes), in non-epidemiological studies (1·35 [1·15–1·58] for arginine homozygotes compared with heterozygotes), and in studies where TP53 genotype was determined from tumour tissue (1·39 [1·13–1·73] for arginine homozygotes compared with heterozygotes). Null results were noted in studies with sound epidemiological design and conduct (1·06 [0·87–1·29] for arginine homozygotes compared with heterozygotes), and studies in which TP53 genotype was determined from white blood cells (1·06 [0·87–1·29] for arginine homozygotes compared with heterozygotes). Interpretation. Subgroup analyses indicated that excess risks were most likely not due to clinical or biological factors, but to errors in study methods. No association was found between cervical cancer and TP53 codon 72 polymorphism when the analysis was restricted to methodologically sound studies.

TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of individual data from 49 studies

RANZANI, GUGLIELMINA;
2009-01-01

Abstract

Background. Cervical cancer is caused primarily by human papillomaviruses (HPV). The polymorphism rs1042522 at codon 72 of the TP53 tumour-suppressor gene has been investigated as a genetic cofactor. More than 80 studies were done between 1998 and 2006, after it was initially reported that women who are homozygous for the arginine allele had a risk for cervical cancer seven times higher than women who were heterozygous for the allele. However, results have been inconsistent. Here we analyse pooled data from 49 studies to determine whether there is an association between TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and cervical cancer. Methods. Individual data on 7946 cases and 7888 controls from 49 diff erent studies worldwide were reanalysed. Odds ratios (OR) were estimated using logistic regression, stratifying by study and ethnic origin. Subgroup analyses were done for infection with HPV, ethnic origin, Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium, study quality, and the material used to determine TP53 genotype. Findings. The pooled estimates (OR) for invasive cervical cancer were 1·22 (95% CI 1·08–1·39) for arginine homozygotes compared with heterozygotes, and 1·13 (0·94–1·35) for arginine homozygotes versus proline homozygotes. Subgroup analyses showed signifi cant excess risks only in studies where controls were not in Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium (1·71 [1·21–2·42] for arginine homozygotes compared with heterozygotes), in non-epidemiological studies (1·35 [1·15–1·58] for arginine homozygotes compared with heterozygotes), and in studies where TP53 genotype was determined from tumour tissue (1·39 [1·13–1·73] for arginine homozygotes compared with heterozygotes). Null results were noted in studies with sound epidemiological design and conduct (1·06 [0·87–1·29] for arginine homozygotes compared with heterozygotes), and studies in which TP53 genotype was determined from white blood cells (1·06 [0·87–1·29] for arginine homozygotes compared with heterozygotes). Interpretation. Subgroup analyses indicated that excess risks were most likely not due to clinical or biological factors, but to errors in study methods. No association was found between cervical cancer and TP53 codon 72 polymorphism when the analysis was restricted to methodologically sound studies.
2009
Oncogenesis & Cancer Research covers research into all aspects of tumorigenesis in vitro as well as the occurrence and pathogenesis of cancer. Emphasis is placed on molecular regulation of cell growth, oncogene expression/function in normal and transformed cells, mechanisms of anti-cancer drug action, and experimental therapeutics. Excluded from this category are resources dealing with the treatment of cancer in humans. Resources concerned with cell growth and differentiation without specific application to mechanisms of oncogenesis are excluded; this material is covered in the Cell & Developmental Biology category.
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Inglese
Internazionale
STAMPA
10
772
784
TP53 gene; polymorphism; cervical cancer; association analysis
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6W85-4WTGKXB-1&_user=3719172&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000061210&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=3719172&md5=af5fa197f7cc0f67816e60c7a373d2b0
48
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Klug, Sj; Ressing, M; Koenig, J; Abba, Mc; Agorastos, T; Brenna, Sm; Ciotti, M; Das, Br; Del Mistro, A; Dybikowska, A; Giuliano, Ar; Gudleviciene, Z; ...espandi
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/201356
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 76
  • Scopus 136
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 129
social impact