We evaluated the efficacy of pregabalin in patients with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy. This randomized, controlled, withdrawal trial included five phases: screening (4–18 days); run-in (4–10 days) to screen out placebo responders; single-blind (28 days) to identify pregabalin responders; double-blind to randomize responders to pregabalin or placebo (35 days); and final study medication taper (7 days). The primary endpoint was time to loss of response (LOR) during the double-blind phase (P1-point increase in pain, discontinuation, or rescue-medication use). In the single-blind phase, 58% of patients had P30% pain reduction. In the double-blind phase, pregabalin (n = 110) and placebo (n = 107) groups did not differ significantly in time to LOR. Adverse events caused the discontinuation of 9.9% and 5.6% of pregabalin-treated and placebo-treated patients, respectively. Most patients with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy responded to pregabalin therapy; however, time to LOR did not significantly differ between pregabalin and placebo. Considering the results of all phases of the study, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions from it, suggesting a need for further work to understand the clinical potential of pregabalin treatment for lumbosacral radiculopathy.

The efficacy and safety of pregabalin in the treatment of neuropathic pain associated with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy

DALLA TOFFOLA, ELENA
2010-01-01

Abstract

We evaluated the efficacy of pregabalin in patients with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy. This randomized, controlled, withdrawal trial included five phases: screening (4–18 days); run-in (4–10 days) to screen out placebo responders; single-blind (28 days) to identify pregabalin responders; double-blind to randomize responders to pregabalin or placebo (35 days); and final study medication taper (7 days). The primary endpoint was time to loss of response (LOR) during the double-blind phase (P1-point increase in pain, discontinuation, or rescue-medication use). In the single-blind phase, 58% of patients had P30% pain reduction. In the double-blind phase, pregabalin (n = 110) and placebo (n = 107) groups did not differ significantly in time to LOR. Adverse events caused the discontinuation of 9.9% and 5.6% of pregabalin-treated and placebo-treated patients, respectively. Most patients with chronic lumbosacral radiculopathy responded to pregabalin therapy; however, time to LOR did not significantly differ between pregabalin and placebo. Considering the results of all phases of the study, it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions from it, suggesting a need for further work to understand the clinical potential of pregabalin treatment for lumbosacral radiculopathy.
2010
Rehabilitation includes resources dealing with therapeutic approaches to developmental disabilities: mental, speech, hearing, visual and other physical disorders. Studies in music, art, dance, and occupational therapy are also included here.
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Inglese
Internazionale
STAMPA
150
420
427
PREGABALIN; LUMBOSACRAL RADICOLOPATHY; NEUROPATHIC PAIN; CLINICAL TRIAL
8
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Balf, Baron; Rainer, Freynhagen; Tomas R., Tolle; Christian, Cloutuer; Teresa, Leon; T., Kevin Murphy; Kem, Phillips; DALLA TOFFOLA, Elena
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/222345
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 50
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact