Aim: The optimal GH regimen, in terms of cost-effectiveness, in children with normal GH immunoreactivity but reduced bioactivity is still debated. Methods: In 12 GH-deficient (GHD) and 12 bioinactive GH children undergoing GH treatment we evaluated the increase in growth velocity, the difference between target height and final stature and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: We found a significant (p < 0.05) increase in growth velocity in both groups during the first year of GH treatment (non-GHD: from -1.7 to 5.4 SDS; GHD: from -1.46 to 4.74 SDS). There was no statistically significant variation between the two groups in the difference between final height and target height. We did not find any significant difference in cost/height gain between GHD (1925.28 +/- 653.15 euro) and bioinactive GH children (1639.55 +/- 631.44 euro). There were also no significant differences in cost/year of therapy between GHD (12347.68 +/- 2018.1 euro) and bioinactive GH children (11355.08 +/- 1747.61 euro). Conclusion: In children with reduced GH biological activity, confirmed by the increase of serum IGF-I levels during generation test, the cost of GH treatment is justified by the positive results obtained in growth and adult height as in classical GHD patients.

Efficacy of long-term growth hormone (GH) therapy in short children with reduced GH biological activity

PAGANI, SARA;MEAZZA, CRISTINA;BOZZOLA, MAURO
2011-01-01

Abstract

Aim: The optimal GH regimen, in terms of cost-effectiveness, in children with normal GH immunoreactivity but reduced bioactivity is still debated. Methods: In 12 GH-deficient (GHD) and 12 bioinactive GH children undergoing GH treatment we evaluated the increase in growth velocity, the difference between target height and final stature and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: We found a significant (p < 0.05) increase in growth velocity in both groups during the first year of GH treatment (non-GHD: from -1.7 to 5.4 SDS; GHD: from -1.46 to 4.74 SDS). There was no statistically significant variation between the two groups in the difference between final height and target height. We did not find any significant difference in cost/height gain between GHD (1925.28 +/- 653.15 euro) and bioinactive GH children (1639.55 +/- 631.44 euro). There were also no significant differences in cost/year of therapy between GHD (12347.68 +/- 2018.1 euro) and bioinactive GH children (11355.08 +/- 1747.61 euro). Conclusion: In children with reduced GH biological activity, confirmed by the increase of serum IGF-I levels during generation test, the cost of GH treatment is justified by the positive results obtained in growth and adult height as in classical GHD patients.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/224173
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 8
social impact