Aim: The optimal GH regimen, in terms of cost-effectiveness, in children with normal GH immunoreactivity but reduced bioactivity is still debated. Methods: In 12 GH-deficient (GHD) and 12 bioinactive GH children undergoing GH treatment we evaluated the increase in growth velocity, the difference between target height and final stature and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: We found a significant (p < 0.05) increase in growth velocity in both groups during the first year of GH treatment (non-GHD: from -1.7 to 5.4 SDS; GHD: from -1.46 to 4.74 SDS). There was no statistically significant variation between the two groups in the difference between final height and target height. We did not find any significant difference in cost/height gain between GHD (1925.28 +/- 653.15 euro) and bioinactive GH children (1639.55 +/- 631.44 euro). There were also no significant differences in cost/year of therapy between GHD (12347.68 +/- 2018.1 euro) and bioinactive GH children (11355.08 +/- 1747.61 euro). Conclusion: In children with reduced GH biological activity, confirmed by the increase of serum IGF-I levels during generation test, the cost of GH treatment is justified by the positive results obtained in growth and adult height as in classical GHD patients.

Efficacy of long-term growth hormone (GH) therapy in short children with reduced GH biological activity

PAGANI, SARA;MEAZZA, CRISTINA;BOZZOLA, MAURO
2011-01-01

Abstract

Aim: The optimal GH regimen, in terms of cost-effectiveness, in children with normal GH immunoreactivity but reduced bioactivity is still debated. Methods: In 12 GH-deficient (GHD) and 12 bioinactive GH children undergoing GH treatment we evaluated the increase in growth velocity, the difference between target height and final stature and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. Results: We found a significant (p < 0.05) increase in growth velocity in both groups during the first year of GH treatment (non-GHD: from -1.7 to 5.4 SDS; GHD: from -1.46 to 4.74 SDS). There was no statistically significant variation between the two groups in the difference between final height and target height. We did not find any significant difference in cost/height gain between GHD (1925.28 +/- 653.15 euro) and bioinactive GH children (1639.55 +/- 631.44 euro). There were also no significant differences in cost/year of therapy between GHD (12347.68 +/- 2018.1 euro) and bioinactive GH children (11355.08 +/- 1747.61 euro). Conclusion: In children with reduced GH biological activity, confirmed by the increase of serum IGF-I levels during generation test, the cost of GH treatment is justified by the positive results obtained in growth and adult height as in classical GHD patients.
2011
The Pediatrics category covers resources on all aspects of clinical medicine in pediatrics. Pediatric specialties including cardiology, dermatology, gastroenterology, hematology, immunology and infectious diseases, neurology, nutrition, oncology, psychiatry, surgery, tropical medicine, urology, and nephrology are also included. Resources concerned with neonatology and adolescent medicine are also covered.
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
STAMPA
34
5
366
369
4
GH THERAPY; SHORT CHILDREN; GH BIOINACTIVITY
no
5
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Pagani, Sara; Meazza, Cristina; Laarej, K.; Cantoni, F.; Bozzola, Mauro
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/224173
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact