Performance-based seismic design (PBSD) can be considered as the coupling of expected levels of ground motion with desired levels of structural performance, with the objective of achieving greater control over earthquake-induced losses. Eurocode 8 (EC8) already envisages two design levels of motion, for no collapse and damage limitation performance targets, anchored to recommended return periods of 475 and 95 years, respectively. For PBSD the earthquake actions need to be presented in ways that are appropriate to the estimation of inelastic displacements, since these provide an eective control on damage at dierent limit states. The adequacy of current earthquake actions in EC8 are reviewed from this perspective and areas requiring additional development are identied. The implications of these representations of the seismic loads, in terms of mapping and zonation, are discussed. The current practice of dening the loading levels on the basis of the pre-selected return periods is challenged, and ideas are discussed for calibrating the loading-performance levels for design on the basis of quantitative earthquake loss estimation.

Adapting earthquake actions in Eurocode 8 for performance-based seismic design

SILVA MOURA PINHO, RUI JORGE
2006-01-01

Abstract

Performance-based seismic design (PBSD) can be considered as the coupling of expected levels of ground motion with desired levels of structural performance, with the objective of achieving greater control over earthquake-induced losses. Eurocode 8 (EC8) already envisages two design levels of motion, for no collapse and damage limitation performance targets, anchored to recommended return periods of 475 and 95 years, respectively. For PBSD the earthquake actions need to be presented in ways that are appropriate to the estimation of inelastic displacements, since these provide an eective control on damage at dierent limit states. The adequacy of current earthquake actions in EC8 are reviewed from this perspective and areas requiring additional development are identied. The implications of these representations of the seismic loads, in terms of mapping and zonation, are discussed. The current practice of dening the loading levels on the basis of the pre-selected return periods is challenged, and ideas are discussed for calibrating the loading-performance levels for design on the basis of quantitative earthquake loss estimation.
2006
Civil Engineering covers engineering-based resources in the subfields of structural engineering, geotechnics, earthquake engineering, ocean engineering, water resources and supply, naval engineering, marine engineering, transportation engineering, and municipal engineering. Topics covered include the planning, design, construction, and maintenance of fixed structures and ground facilities for industry, occupancy, transportation, use and control of water, and harbor facilities.
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Inglese
Internazionale
STAMPA
35
1
39
55
PERFORMANCE-BASED SEISMIC DESIGN; EARTHQUAKE ACTIONS; RETURN PERIODS; DESIGN LEVELS; LOSS MODELLING; EUROCODE 8
2
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Bommer Julian, J.; SILVA MOURA PINHO, RUI JORGE
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/30980
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 70
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 57
social impact