In a swine model of orthotopic small bowel transplantation, we assessed the efficacy of combined therapy with a low dose of tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil, compared with high-dose tacrolimus monotherapy. The bowel was replaced in 25 piglets: group 1 (n=5), no immunosuppression; group 2 (n=10), tacrolimus, 0.3 mg/kg daily i.m. for 7 days, followed by b.i.d. oral doses to maintain blood levels of 15-25 ng/ml; and group 3 (n=10), tacrolimus, 0.1 mg/kg i.m., in a single dose on day 0 and thereafter oral doses to maintain blood levels of 5-15 ng/ml, plus oral mycophenolate mofetil (10 mg/kg twice daily). Follow-up time was limited to 60 days, Median survival time was 11, 27, and >60 days in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P=0.001). Survival rates were 0%, 40%, and 80% at 30 days and 0%, 0%, and 70% at 60 days in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P=0.03, group 1 vs. group 2; P=0.003, group 1 vs. group 3; P=0.02, group 2 vs, group 3). One animal in group 1 (20%) and two animals each in groups 2 and 3 (20%) died of technical complications. Rejection was the cause of death of 80% of animals of group 1 and of no animals in either group 2 or 3. None of the immunosuppressed animals developed clinical or histopathological evidence of graft-versus-host disease. Sixty percent of animals in group 2 (n=6) and 10% in group 3 (n=1) died from infections; two other animals in group 2 died of emaciation. The seven animals of group 3 that were alive at 60 days had immunosuppression stopped at that time. All died of rejection within 1 month. In conclusion, double-drug therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil consistently allowed extended survival after small bowel transplantation in swine, preventing or controlling acute cellular rejection without a high incidence of lethal complications related to overimmunosuppression.

Combined immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil for small bowel transplantation in pigs

ALESSIANI, MARIO;DIONIGI, PAOLO;ARBUSTINI, ELOISA;ZONTA, ARIS
1996-01-01

Abstract

In a swine model of orthotopic small bowel transplantation, we assessed the efficacy of combined therapy with a low dose of tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil, compared with high-dose tacrolimus monotherapy. The bowel was replaced in 25 piglets: group 1 (n=5), no immunosuppression; group 2 (n=10), tacrolimus, 0.3 mg/kg daily i.m. for 7 days, followed by b.i.d. oral doses to maintain blood levels of 15-25 ng/ml; and group 3 (n=10), tacrolimus, 0.1 mg/kg i.m., in a single dose on day 0 and thereafter oral doses to maintain blood levels of 5-15 ng/ml, plus oral mycophenolate mofetil (10 mg/kg twice daily). Follow-up time was limited to 60 days, Median survival time was 11, 27, and >60 days in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P=0.001). Survival rates were 0%, 40%, and 80% at 30 days and 0%, 0%, and 70% at 60 days in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P=0.03, group 1 vs. group 2; P=0.003, group 1 vs. group 3; P=0.02, group 2 vs, group 3). One animal in group 1 (20%) and two animals each in groups 2 and 3 (20%) died of technical complications. Rejection was the cause of death of 80% of animals of group 1 and of no animals in either group 2 or 3. None of the immunosuppressed animals developed clinical or histopathological evidence of graft-versus-host disease. Sixty percent of animals in group 2 (n=6) and 10% in group 3 (n=1) died from infections; two other animals in group 2 died of emaciation. The seven animals of group 3 that were alive at 60 days had immunosuppression stopped at that time. All died of rejection within 1 month. In conclusion, double-drug therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil consistently allowed extended survival after small bowel transplantation in swine, preventing or controlling acute cellular rejection without a high incidence of lethal complications related to overimmunosuppression.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/456966
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact