The assessment of existing masonry buildings is an important issue in earthquake prone countries like Italy. The current Italian building code, which adopts the approach proposed by Eurocode 8, includes an assessment procedure based on the use of confidence factors, whose values depend on the level of knowledge of the structure. These factors are intended to take into account all possible uncertainties related to the incomplete knowledge of the structure. This article investigates the reliability of the code-based procedure for the assessment of existing masonry buildings and pinpoints some problematic aspects. The approach followed is the simulation of the entire code-based assessment procedure, with the flow of decisions that an engineer would face in the assessment of an existing building schematized in the form of a logic tree. The proposed simulated procedure accounts for different sources of epistemic uncertainty like the selection of the level of knowledge, uncertainty in the results and location of in-situ tests, identification of several structural details, etc. A Monte Carlo procedure allows the simulation of a large number of random assessments intended to be performed by different virtual engineers. The results are then compared with those coming from the assessment of the “perfectly known” structure, used as a benchmark, providing an estimate of the validity of the codified assessment methodology.

Evaluation of Uncertainties in the Seismic Assesment of Existing Masonry Buildings

ROTA, MARIA;PENNA, ANDREA;MAGENES, GUIDO
2012-01-01

Abstract

The assessment of existing masonry buildings is an important issue in earthquake prone countries like Italy. The current Italian building code, which adopts the approach proposed by Eurocode 8, includes an assessment procedure based on the use of confidence factors, whose values depend on the level of knowledge of the structure. These factors are intended to take into account all possible uncertainties related to the incomplete knowledge of the structure. This article investigates the reliability of the code-based procedure for the assessment of existing masonry buildings and pinpoints some problematic aspects. The approach followed is the simulation of the entire code-based assessment procedure, with the flow of decisions that an engineer would face in the assessment of an existing building schematized in the form of a logic tree. The proposed simulated procedure accounts for different sources of epistemic uncertainty like the selection of the level of knowledge, uncertainty in the results and location of in-situ tests, identification of several structural details, etc. A Monte Carlo procedure allows the simulation of a large number of random assessments intended to be performed by different virtual engineers. The results are then compared with those coming from the assessment of the “perfectly known” structure, used as a benchmark, providing an estimate of the validity of the codified assessment methodology.
2012
Civil Engineering covers engineering-based resources in the subfields of structural engineering, geotechnics, earthquake engineering, ocean engineering, water resources and supply, naval engineering, marine engineering, transportation engineering, and municipal engineering. Topics covered include the planning, design, construction, and maintenance of fixed structures and ground facilities for industry, occupancy, transportation, use and control of water, and harbor facilities.
Sì, ma tipo non specificato
Inglese
Internazionale
STAMPA
16
Suppl. 1
36
64
29
Masonry; Seismic Assessment; Knowledge Level; Confidence Factor; Monte Carlo Simulation
4
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Tondelli, Marco; Rota, Maria; Penna, Andrea; Magenes, Guido
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/461970
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 48
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 40
social impact