The paper evaluates the tenability of two classical arguments about axiological scpeticism. Sextus Empiricus' argument is tenable since is an a priori argument; Blaise Pascal's argument is untenable since is an a posteriori argument
Two Arguments for Axiological Scpeticism
COLLOCA, STEFANO
2013-01-01
Abstract
The paper evaluates the tenability of two classical arguments about axiological scpeticism. Sextus Empiricus' argument is tenable since is an a priori argument; Blaise Pascal's argument is untenable since is an a posteriori argumentFile in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
