Physical environment is the ruling factor of vegetation patterns in mountain areas, where vegetation mosaics are determined by a complex interplay among topography, geomorphology and soil. A deep analysis of such interplay is pivotal in order to build vegetation anamnesis and make sound projections. Instead, even recent cartographic models are still linked to standard statistical methods which are not on top of an efficient uncovering of knotty associations among these kinds of data. To this aim, in this study we propose a novel approach for: (a) assessing the associations among vegetation, soil, topography and geomorphology; (b) measuring the frequency and strength of these associations; (c) define in a rigorous way land units based on vegetation–soil–geomorphology associations; (d) advance hypotheses on the causes and prospects of the existing spatial pattern. In order to test the strength of the proposed methodology we applied it to a case study in the above-tree-line glacial cirque of Mount Prado (Northern Apennines, N Italy). In this area, the vegetation mosaic is still strongly conditioned by physical features but in a lower measure with respect to the higher alpine sites. We have been able to detect and weight 168 kinds of associations among vegetation, soil and geomorphological types, 1092 kinds of associations among vegetation and topographic variables and 12 land units with inner dominance of a particular association. The analysis of associations between vegetation types, soils, topography and landforms produced considerable insights into the ecology of the occurring plant communities. This proposed analytic methodology can be extended to other regions (e.g. mountain and alpine areas) and can also be considered a tool for interpreting present landscape heterogeneity also in a historical perspective.

Detecting complex relations among vegetation, soil and geomorphology. An in-depth method applied to a case study in the Apennines (Italy)

ROSSI, GRAZIANO;
2014-01-01

Abstract

Physical environment is the ruling factor of vegetation patterns in mountain areas, where vegetation mosaics are determined by a complex interplay among topography, geomorphology and soil. A deep analysis of such interplay is pivotal in order to build vegetation anamnesis and make sound projections. Instead, even recent cartographic models are still linked to standard statistical methods which are not on top of an efficient uncovering of knotty associations among these kinds of data. To this aim, in this study we propose a novel approach for: (a) assessing the associations among vegetation, soil, topography and geomorphology; (b) measuring the frequency and strength of these associations; (c) define in a rigorous way land units based on vegetation–soil–geomorphology associations; (d) advance hypotheses on the causes and prospects of the existing spatial pattern. In order to test the strength of the proposed methodology we applied it to a case study in the above-tree-line glacial cirque of Mount Prado (Northern Apennines, N Italy). In this area, the vegetation mosaic is still strongly conditioned by physical features but in a lower measure with respect to the higher alpine sites. We have been able to detect and weight 168 kinds of associations among vegetation, soil and geomorphological types, 1092 kinds of associations among vegetation and topographic variables and 12 land units with inner dominance of a particular association. The analysis of associations between vegetation types, soils, topography and landforms produced considerable insights into the ecology of the occurring plant communities. This proposed analytic methodology can be extended to other regions (e.g. mountain and alpine areas) and can also be considered a tool for interpreting present landscape heterogeneity also in a historical perspective.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/848459
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact