Out-of-plane (OOP) mechanisms are one of the major causes of structural collapse in unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings as observed in recent as well as past seismic events. Among such failures, two-way bending mechanisms involving at least one restrained vertical edge constitute a very distinct majority. Nevertheless, very little research pertaining to such mechanisms can be found currently in literature. The paper takes a step forward in this topic through the execution and interpretation of dynamic tests on four full-scale single leaf and one full-scale cavity URM walls. Each tested full-scale specimen consisting of a OOP panel and two return walls, varying in terms of commonly encountered boundary conditions, applied overburden or the presence/absence of an opening. The specimens were subjected to sequences of incremental input motion till collapse and these results are presented in terms of deformed shapes, failure mechanisms and force-displacement hysteretic curves. State of the art analytical techniques based on the method of virtual work are applied to evaluate their reliability as simplified tools for assessing the behaviour of such wall subjected to OOP two-way bending excitation. The testing campaign resulted in all specimens exhibiting a rather brittle response, despite sustaining accelerations of 1 g without any damage.

Experimental response of URM single leaf and cavity walls in out-of-plane two-way bending generated by seismic excitation

Graziotti, F.
;
TOMASSETTI, UMBERTO;Sharma, S.;GROTTOLI, LUCA;Magenes, G.
Supervision
2019-01-01

Abstract

Out-of-plane (OOP) mechanisms are one of the major causes of structural collapse in unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings as observed in recent as well as past seismic events. Among such failures, two-way bending mechanisms involving at least one restrained vertical edge constitute a very distinct majority. Nevertheless, very little research pertaining to such mechanisms can be found currently in literature. The paper takes a step forward in this topic through the execution and interpretation of dynamic tests on four full-scale single leaf and one full-scale cavity URM walls. Each tested full-scale specimen consisting of a OOP panel and two return walls, varying in terms of commonly encountered boundary conditions, applied overburden or the presence/absence of an opening. The specimens were subjected to sequences of incremental input motion till collapse and these results are presented in terms of deformed shapes, failure mechanisms and force-displacement hysteretic curves. State of the art analytical techniques based on the method of virtual work are applied to evaluate their reliability as simplified tools for assessing the behaviour of such wall subjected to OOP two-way bending excitation. The testing campaign resulted in all specimens exhibiting a rather brittle response, despite sustaining accelerations of 1 g without any damage.
2019
Civil Engineering covers engineering-based resources in the subfields of structural engineering, geotechnics, earthquake engineering, ocean engineering, water resources and supply, naval engineering, marine engineering, transportation engineering, and municipal engineering. Topics covered include the planning, design, construction, and maintenance of fixed structures and ground facilities for industry, occupancy, transportation, use and control of water, and harbor facilities.
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
ELETTRONICO
195
650
670
21
UNREINFORCED MASONRY WALLS; PERFORMANCE; EARTHQUAKE; PROGRAM
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.076
5
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Graziotti, F.; Tomassetti, Umberto; Sharma, S.; Grottoli, Luca; Magenes, G.
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/1228487
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 82
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 69
social impact