Purpose: This study aims to investigate and compare three nonplanar (NP) slicing algorithms. The algorithms aim to control the layer thickness variation (LTV), which is a common issue in supportless fabrication of free-form parts. The comparison underlines the differences between theoretical and real scenarios, resulting in guidelines for toolpath generation of complex objects. Design/methodology/approach: The algorithm comparison uses a representative complex geometry, i.e. the quarter of torus. It presents an increasing overhang and constant curvature. It is represented using a parametric definition in the first two algorithms and by triangular meshes as the real scenario. The algorithms work on the contouring stage, whereas a B-spline approach is used to build the inner side of layers. Constant layer thickness (LT) is imposed, and an adaptive approach is adopted to avoid over-extrusion. Three algorithms are validated with a robotized fused deposition modeling system. LTs are measured on cross-sectioned samples and compared with the theoretical cases. Findings: The results show that two algorithms can provide an LTV of about 0% on the contour. Nevertheless, the theoretical results on the inner side are divergent from the previous evidence, moving on to higher LTV (approximately 90%). The need for an adaptive approach is demonstrated, resulting in an LTV reduction (approximately 30%). Printed parts present the same trends of theoretical results confirming the algorithms’ capabilities. Originality/value: The work shows, for the first time, a comparison between NP slicing techniques. The LTV problem in hollow and filled components is analyzed through theoretical and experimental evidence. The results are promising for supportless fabrication of free-form parts.

Robotic FDM for free-form fabrication: evaluating adaptive non-planar slicing with different contour methods

Furlan V.;Insero F.;Giberti H.
2025-01-01

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate and compare three nonplanar (NP) slicing algorithms. The algorithms aim to control the layer thickness variation (LTV), which is a common issue in supportless fabrication of free-form parts. The comparison underlines the differences between theoretical and real scenarios, resulting in guidelines for toolpath generation of complex objects. Design/methodology/approach: The algorithm comparison uses a representative complex geometry, i.e. the quarter of torus. It presents an increasing overhang and constant curvature. It is represented using a parametric definition in the first two algorithms and by triangular meshes as the real scenario. The algorithms work on the contouring stage, whereas a B-spline approach is used to build the inner side of layers. Constant layer thickness (LT) is imposed, and an adaptive approach is adopted to avoid over-extrusion. Three algorithms are validated with a robotized fused deposition modeling system. LTs are measured on cross-sectioned samples and compared with the theoretical cases. Findings: The results show that two algorithms can provide an LTV of about 0% on the contour. Nevertheless, the theoretical results on the inner side are divergent from the previous evidence, moving on to higher LTV (approximately 90%). The need for an adaptive approach is demonstrated, resulting in an LTV reduction (approximately 30%). Printed parts present the same trends of theoretical results confirming the algorithms’ capabilities. Originality/value: The work shows, for the first time, a comparison between NP slicing techniques. The LTV problem in hollow and filled components is analyzed through theoretical and experimental evidence. The results are promising for supportless fabrication of free-form parts.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/1521575
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact