The aim of this study was to compare the effect of telmisartan and eprosartan on insulin sensitivity in overweight hypertensive patients. Fifty overweight (BMI > or = 25 and <30 kg/m (2)) outpatients, aged 41-65 years, with mild to moderate hypertension [systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 90 and < or = 110 mmHg], after a 4-week placebo period, were randomized to receive telmisartan 80 mg or eprosartan 600 mg for 8 weeks. Following another 4-week placebo period, patients were crossed to the alternative regimen for further 8 weeks. At the end of each placebo and active treatment period, blood pressure (BP), insulin sensitivity (by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin (FPI), total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglycerides (Tg) were evaluated. Insulin sensitivity was expressed as the amount of glucose infused during the last 30 min (glucose infusion rate, GIR) in micromol/min/kg. Both telmisartan and eprosartan significantly reduced SBP/DBP values (by a mean of 19.4/13.3 mmHg and 17.9/12.1 mmHg respectively, all p<0.001 vs. placebo), with no significant difference between the two treatments. GIR was significantly increased by telmisartan (2.25+/-0.61 micromol/min/kg, p<0.05 vs. placebo) but not by eprosartan (0.25+/-0.14 micromol/min/kg, p=ns), the difference between the two drugs being statistically significant (p<0.02). No change in FPG, FPI, HDL-C, and Tg was observed with either treatment. Telmisartan significantly reduced TC (-9.9 mg/dl, -5\%, p<0.04 vs. placebo) and LDL-C (-8.8 mg/dl, -7\%, p<0.03 vs. placebo), whereas eprosartan did not influence them. These findings indicate a superiority regarding an improvement of insulin sensitivity and plasma lipid profile in overweight hypertensives by telmisartan as compared to eprosartan, possibly related to the selective stimulating PPAR-gamma property of telmisartan.

Comparative effects of telmisartan and eprosartan on insulin sensitivity in the treatment of overweight hypertensive patients

FOGARI, ROBERTO;FERRARI, ILARIA;PRETI, PAOLA STEFANIA;DEROSA, GIUSEPPE
2009-01-01

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of telmisartan and eprosartan on insulin sensitivity in overweight hypertensive patients. Fifty overweight (BMI > or = 25 and <30 kg/m (2)) outpatients, aged 41-65 years, with mild to moderate hypertension [systolic blood pressure (SBP) >140 and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 90 and < or = 110 mmHg], after a 4-week placebo period, were randomized to receive telmisartan 80 mg or eprosartan 600 mg for 8 weeks. Following another 4-week placebo period, patients were crossed to the alternative regimen for further 8 weeks. At the end of each placebo and active treatment period, blood pressure (BP), insulin sensitivity (by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), insulin (FPI), total cholesterol (TC), LDL-C, HDL-C, and triglycerides (Tg) were evaluated. Insulin sensitivity was expressed as the amount of glucose infused during the last 30 min (glucose infusion rate, GIR) in micromol/min/kg. Both telmisartan and eprosartan significantly reduced SBP/DBP values (by a mean of 19.4/13.3 mmHg and 17.9/12.1 mmHg respectively, all p<0.001 vs. placebo), with no significant difference between the two treatments. GIR was significantly increased by telmisartan (2.25+/-0.61 micromol/min/kg, p<0.05 vs. placebo) but not by eprosartan (0.25+/-0.14 micromol/min/kg, p=ns), the difference between the two drugs being statistically significant (p<0.02). No change in FPG, FPI, HDL-C, and Tg was observed with either treatment. Telmisartan significantly reduced TC (-9.9 mg/dl, -5\%, p<0.04 vs. placebo) and LDL-C (-8.8 mg/dl, -7\%, p<0.03 vs. placebo), whereas eprosartan did not influence them. These findings indicate a superiority regarding an improvement of insulin sensitivity and plasma lipid profile in overweight hypertensives by telmisartan as compared to eprosartan, possibly related to the selective stimulating PPAR-gamma property of telmisartan.
2009
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism is a cross-disciplinary category combining molecular, cellular and clinical science studies of the endocrine glands, and the regulation of cell, organ, and system function by the action of secreted hormones. Chemical/biological properties of hormones, and the pathogenesis and treatment of disorders associated with either source or target organs are also covered. Nutrition coverage includes biochemical characteristics of nutrients, physiology of absorption, biological trace elements, clinical nutrition and malnutrition, and the biomedicine of obesity. Specific areas of interest include reproductive endocrinology, pancreatic hormones and diabetes, regulation of bone formation and loss, and control of growth. Resources focusing on neuroendocrinology are excluded and are placed in the Neuroscience & Behavior category.
Esperti anonimi
Inglese
Internazionale
ELETTRONICO
41
893
898
5
Acrylates; therapeutic use, Adult, Aged, Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; therapeutic use, Benzimidazoles; therapeutic use, Benzoates; therapeutic use, Blood Glucose, Female, Humans, Hypertension; blood/complications/drug therapy/physiopathology, Imidazoles; therapeutic use, Insulin; metabolism, Male, Middle Aged, Overweight; blood/complications/drug therapy/physiopathology, Thiophenes; therapeutic use
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1237359
7
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
262
Fogari, Roberto; Zoppi, A; Ferrari, Ilaria; Mugellini, A; Preti, PAOLA STEFANIA; Lazzari, P; Derosa, Giuseppe
1 Contributo su Rivista::1.1 Articolo in rivista
none
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11571/378990
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 8
  • Scopus 32
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 28
social impact